In the Matter of Dilla

8 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 753 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
  2. INS v. Phinpathya

    464 U.S. 183 (1984)   Cited 247 times
    Holding that thirty-two-year-old statute must still be given its plain meaning
  3. Wadman v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    329 F.2d 812 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 60 times
    Adopting a uniform definition of adultery
  4. Kamheangpatiyooth v. Immigration Nat. Serv

    597 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 26 times
    In INS v. Jong Ha Wang, this Court observed that a narrow interpretation of the term "extreme hardship" was "consistent with the `extreme hardship' language, which itself indicates the exceptional nature of the suspension remedy."
  5. Git Foo Wong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    358 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that an innocent visit to Mexico for two hours should not be regarded as meaningfully interruptive of continuous presence in the United States under 8 U.S.C. § 1254
  6. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,635 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  7. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  8. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,132 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility