In the Matter of Contreras

14 Cited authorities

Rosenberg v. Fleuti
374 U.S. 449 (1963) Cited 241 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"
Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigration Nat. Serv
516 F.2d 565 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 56 times 1 Legal Analyses
Discussing Pino and finality for immigration purposes
Palatian v. I. N. S
502 F.2d 1091 (9th Cir. 1974) Cited 12 times
Ruling that returning alien who tried to smuggle in twenty-eight bricks of marijuana committed an entry because "[t]he `purpose of the visit' referred to in Fleuti . . . may have been innocent when it began, but it was not innocent when [the alien] sought to re-enter this country"
Cuevas-Cuevas v. I. N. S
523 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1975) Cited 8 times
In Cuevas-Cuevas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 523 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1975) (per curiam), the court referred with apparent approval to the Immigration and Naturalization Service's reliance on petitioner's plea of guilty to a charge of knowingly and willfully aiding and abetting aliens to enter the United States unlawfully. The court stated that the guilty plea established only the aiding and abetting but did not establish that these actions were "for gain" as required under the relevant deportation statute.
Longoria-Castenada v. Immigration Nat. Serv
548 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1977) Cited 6 times
Holding that immigration authorities may not go beyond the judicial record of conviction to make an independent determination of guilt or innocence
Vargas-Banuelos v. I.N.S.
466 F.2d 1371 (5th Cir. 1972) Cited 9 times
Concluding that an alien who formed the intent to commit a crime after he departed did not depart for an unlawful purpose under the Fleuti analysis
Plasencia v. Sureck
637 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 2 times
No. 78-2641. Argued and Submitted May 5, 1980. Decided November 7, 1980. Denis W. Campbell, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellant. C. William Kircher, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges and CORDOVA, District Judge. Honorable Valdemar A. Cordova, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. SCHROEDER
Ribeiro v. Immigration Naturalization Serv
531 F.2d 179 (3d Cir. 1976) Cited 3 times
In Ribeiro v. INS, 531 F.2d 179 (3d Cir. 1976), the defendant, a resident alien, arranged for the travel of an alien from Montreal to Albany, New York. The evidence indicated that the defendant was to receive a total of $150, approximately $100 of which was to cover expenses.
Pryce v. Immigration Naturalization Service
568 F.2d 278 (2d Cir. 1978) Cited 1 times
No. 139, Docket 77-4084. Argued September 14, 1977. Decided January 12, 1978. Richard J. Madison, New York City (Gerald Kaiser, P. C., New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Richard J. Leon, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn Heights, N.Y. (Robert B. Fiske, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Patrick H. Barth, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before MANSFIELD and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges, and DOOLING, District Judge. Of the Eastern District of
Gallegos v. Hoy
262 F.2d 665 (9th Cir. 1958) Cited 5 times
In Gallegos v. Hoy, 262 F.2d 665 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed.2d 1547 (1959), a resident alien couple arranged for the illegal entry of an alien they then employed as a domestic servant.
Section 2 - Principals
18 U.S.C. § 2 Cited 24,372 times 59 Legal Analyses
Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law
Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
18 U.S.C. § 371 Cited 21,875 times 143 Legal Analyses
Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"
Section 1101 - Definitions
8 U.S.C. § 1101 Cited 16,700 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1182 Cited 9,902 times 69 Legal Analyses
Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

In the Matter of Contreras

14 Cited authorities

Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

Discussing Pino and finality for immigration purposes

Ruling that returning alien who tried to smuggle in twenty-eight bricks of marijuana committed an entry because "[t]he `purpose of the visit' referred to in Fleuti . . . may have been innocent when it began, but it was not innocent when [the alien] sought to re-enter this country"

Holding that immigration authorities may not go beyond the judicial record of conviction to make an independent determination of guilt or innocence

Concluding that an alien who formed the intent to commit a crime after he departed did not depart for an unlawful purpose under the Fleuti analysis

In Ribeiro v. INS, 531 F.2d 179 (3d Cir. 1976), the defendant, a resident alien, arranged for the travel of an alien from Montreal to Albany, New York. The evidence indicated that the defendant was to receive a total of $150, approximately $100 of which was to cover expenses.

In Gallegos v. Hoy, 262 F.2d 665 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed.2d 1547 (1959), a resident alien couple arranged for the illegal entry of an alien they then employed as a domestic servant.

Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"