In the Matter of Church Scientology Int'l

10 Cited authorities

  1. Pearson v. Williams

    202 U.S. 281 (1906)   Cited 54 times
    Taking the position that agencies "are not courts, and their determinations are not judgments"
  2. Johnson-Laird v. Immigration Natural. Service

    537 F. Supp. 52 (D. Or. 1981)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. No. 81-128-RE. October 20, 1981. Gerald H. Robinson, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs. Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., Laury H. Hennings, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for defendant. REDDEN, District Judge: This is an immigration case which presents, on cross motions for summary judgment, a legal issue of first impression. This issue concerns the proper interpretation of section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(L), which allows "a firm or corporation

  3. Lazarescu v. United States

    199 F.2d 898 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 18 times
    Finding that entry through inspection by an immigration officer did not make entry lawful
  4. Mannerfrid v. Brownell

    238 F.2d 32 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13242. Argued June 29, 1956. Decided October 18, 1956. Mr. George Spiegelberg, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, New York City, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Jack Wasserman and Ralph Becker, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. David Carliner, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellant. Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Mr. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Messrs. Lewis Carroll and Joseph M.F. Ryan, Jr

  5. Mannerfrid v. Brownell

    145 F. Supp. 55 (D.D.C. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 4258-54. January 30, 1956. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Sam Harris, New York City, for plaintiff. Leo A. Rover, U.S. Atty., Oliver Gasch, Frank H. Strickler and Joseph M.F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendant. YOUNGDAHL, District Judge. This cause came on to be heard on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff is a native and citizen of Sweden who first came to the United States as a temporary business visitor on June 4, 1941. Extensions of his temporary

  6. United States v. Watkins

    179 F.2d 137 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 5 times

    No. 118, Docket 21495. Argued December 16, 1949. Decided January 5, 1950. Hyman Margolis, Brooklyn, N.Y., for relator-appellant. Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City, William J. Sexton, Assistant United States Attorney, New York City, Louis Steinberg, District Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, Max Blau, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, Lester Friedman, Attorney

  7. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,700 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  8. Section 214.2 - Special requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status

    8 C.F.R. § 214.2   Cited 462 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Restating cap in 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(l)
  9. Section 656.21 - Supervised recruitment

    20 C.F.R. § 656.21   Cited 37 times
    Requiring information about alien's qualifications, which employer must provide on Application for Alien Employment Certification
  10. Section 656.10 - General instructions

    20 C.F.R. § 656.10   Cited 31 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (a)Filing of applications. A request for a labor certification on behalf of any alien who is required by the Act to be a beneficiary of a labor certification in order to obtain permanent resident status in the United States may be filed as follows: (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2), (3), and (4) of this section, an employer seeking a labor certification must file under this section and § 656.17 . (2) An employer seeking a labor certification for a college or university teacher must apply