§
In the Matter of C

9 Cited authorities

  1. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 573 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  2. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"

  3. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy

    338 U.S. 521 (1950)   Cited 29 times
    In United States ex rel. Eichenlaub v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 521, 70 S.Ct. 329, 94 L.Ed. 307 (1950), the Supreme Court was confronted with a case involving naturalized citizens, whose citizenship was later revoked and cancelled ab initio for fraud in the procurement.

  4. Pearson v. Williams

    202 U.S. 281 (1906)   Cited 54 times
    Taking the position that agencies "are not courts, and their determinations are not judgments"

  5. State, ex Rel. v. Zangerle

    136 Ohio St. 371 (Ohio 1940)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In State ex rel. Gordon v. Zangerle (1940), 136 Ohio St. 371, 375, 16 O.O. 536, 538, 26 N.E.2d 190, 194, the court considered the "scope of the executive power" conferred by Section 11, Article III, determining that the common-law meaning of the terms "reprieves" and "commutations" are "not materially different" from the statutory definitions (which are the same today).

  6. United States v. Ahrens

    113 F. Supp. 22 (E.D. La. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    Misc. No. 854. June 8, 1953. William C. Orchard, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. John N. McKay, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for respondent. WRIGHT, District Judge. This habeas corpus proceeding was brought to test the validity of an order of deportation issued pursuant to the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. Relator attacks the constitutionality of section 242(b) of that act on the ground that the deportation procedure provided therein denied him due process of law in

  7. United States Lines Co. v. Shaughnessy

    101 F. Supp. 61 (S.D.N.Y. 1951)   Cited 5 times

    June 20, 1951. Kirlin, Campbell Keating, New York City, Delbert M. Tibbetts, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff. Irving H. Saypol, U.S. Atty., New York City, John M. Cunneen, New York City, of counsel, for defendant. SUGARMAN, District Judge. The plaintiff United States Lines Company commenced this action against W.F. Watkins, Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service of New York, for a declaratory judgment, an injunction, and money damages. Subsequently, by stipulation entered into

  8. United States v. Murff

    116 F. Supp. 163 (D. Md. 1953)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 6954. November 10, 1953. H. Raymond Cluster, Baltimore, Md., for relator. George Cochran Doub, U.S. Atty., Walter E. Black, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., Abraham Scharf, Department of Immigration and Naturalization, Baltimore, Md., for respondent. CHESNUT, District Judge. The petitioner, an alien, is seeking a writ of habeas corpus to release him from the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration under a warrant for deportation. A rule to show cause was issued on the filing

  9. Fehl v. Martin

    155 Or. 455 (Or. 1937)   Cited 11 times

    Argued December 2, 1936 Affirmed January 19, 1937 Rehearing denied February 9, 1937 Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County, L.G. LEWELLING, Judge. Irvin Goodman, of Portland, for appellant. Ralph E. Moody, Assistant Attorney General (I.H. Van Winkle, Attorney General, on the brief), for respondents. In Banc. Suit by Earl H. Fehl against Charles H. Martin, governor of Oregon, and others. From a decree dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals. AFFIRMED. REHEARING DENIED. RAND, J. On August 15, 1933