§

In re Valenzuela-Felix

Interim Decision #3773 (B.I.A. 2012)
In re Valenzuela-Felix

16 Cited authorities

  1. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"

  2. Taniguchi v. Schultz

    303 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 182 times
    Holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), which denied a waiver of deportation to lawful permanent resident aggravated felons but not to other aliens, did not violate equal protection

  3. Lara-Ruiz v. I.N.S.

    241 F.3d 934 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 86 times
    Holding "that [INA] § 101 is not ambiguous" and rejecting petitioner's argument that the rule of lenity should be applied to determine the definition of "sexual abuse of a minor"

  4. Moore v. Ashcroft

    251 F.3d 919 (11th Cir. 2001)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that the time bar on readmission to the United States after applicant’s removal satisfied the injury requirement

  5. Doe v. Attorney Gen. of the United States

    659 F.3d 266 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that Chevron deference does not apply when there is no ambiguous term and the statute is clear

  6. Gonzaga–Ortega v. Holder

    694 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 3 times

    No. 07–74361. 2012-09-14 Francisco M. GONZAGA–ORTEGA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner. Craig Alan Newell, Jr. (argued), Gregory G. Katsas, Blair T. O'Connor, Briena L. Strippoli, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. CLIFTON Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner. Craig Alan Newell, Jr. (argued), Gregory G. Katsas, Blair T. O'Connor

  7. Conceiro v. Marks

    360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)   Cited 4 times
    In Conceiro v. Marks, 360 F. Supp. 454 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) (Wyatt, J.), habeas corpus relief was denied because the court could find no abuse of discretion in the district director's denial of parole to an excludable political asylum applicant.

  8. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)   Cited 7 times
    In Klapholz v. Esperdy, 201 F. Supp. 294 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), the alien applied for admission on shipboard on July 30, 1956, and was served with Form I-122 on August 2, 1956.

  9. Klapholz v. Esperdy

    302 F.2d 928 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 5 times

    No. 324, Docket 27399. Argued April 26, 1962. Decided May 18, 1962. Jackson G. Cook, New York City (Stuart Wadler, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the S.D. of New York, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a summary judgment which dismissed a complaint seeking review of an exclusion order

  10. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,700 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,902 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,028 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

  13. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,203 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  14. Section 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens; referral for hearing

    8 U.S.C. § 1225   Cited 1,297 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Setting standard for credible fear as "a significant possibility, taking into account the ... statements made by the alien ... and such other facts as are known to the officer, that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum"

  15. Section 5332 - Bulk cash smuggling into or out of the United States

    31 U.S.C. § 5332   Cited 204 times
    Omitting any requirement that the funds be unlawfully derived

  16. Section 235.2 - Parole for deferred inspection

    8 C.F.R. § 235.2   Cited 14 times

    (a) A district director may, in his or her discretion, defer the inspection of any vessel or aircraft, or of any alien, to another Service office or port-of-entry. Any alien coming to a United States port from a foreign port, from an outlying possession of the United States, from Guam, Puerto Rico, or the Virgin Islands of the United States, or from another port of the United States at which examination under this part was deferred, shall be regarded as an applicant for admission at that onward port