§
In re Valdez

43 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Salerno

    481 U.S. 739 (1987)   Cited 5,653 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a facial challenger "must establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid"

  2. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,864 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute may apply retroactively when "clear congressional intent favor such a result"

  3. INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca

    480 U.S. 421 (1987)   Cited 2,408 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the phrase "well-founded fear," which is also found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101, is ambiguous

  4. Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

    488 U.S. 204 (1988)   Cited 1,735 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts will not defer to an agency's litigating position where it contradicts the agency's prior “regulations, rulings, or administrative practice”

  5. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.

    514 U.S. 211 (1995)   Cited 903 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding legislated invalidation of final judgments to be categorically unconstitutional

  6. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.

    511 U.S. 298 (1994)   Cited 710 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an increase in monetary liability could not be applied retroactively even though the "normative scope of Title VII's prohibition on workplace discrimination" was not altered

  7. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

    486 U.S. 281 (1988)   Cited 806 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a C.F.R. provision invalid because it conflicted with the unequivocal language of the statute

  8. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n

    485 U.S. 439 (1988)   Cited 804 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an adherent was not entitled to challenge a third party's actions that offended his beliefs

  9. Schall v. Martin

    467 U.S. 253 (1984)   Cited 655 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that protecting the community from crime is a compelling interest

  10. Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

    489 U.S. 561 (1989)   Cited 267 times
    Holding that creditors were not required to exhaust the Federal Home Loan Bank Board's administrative claims procedure before bringing suit against a federal bank

  11. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,229 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  12. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,700 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  13. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable