In re Sanchez-Lopez

10 Cited authorities

Perrin v. United States
444 U.S. 37 (1979) Cited 1,147 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that commercial bribery falls under the definition of bribery under the Travel Act, which was passed nine years before RICO was enacted
Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales
439 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2006) Cited 325 times
Holding that no due process violation exists unless "the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his case"
People v. Ibarra
156 Cal.App.4th 1174 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 244 times
Holding that a unanimity instruction was not required regarding the specific acts that constituted stalking because the crime required proof of a course of conduct, not particular individual acts
Arriaga v. Mukasey
521 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 2008) Cited 52 times
Declining to consider facial vagueness challenge where alien had not identified a constitutionally-protected right compromised by the immigration statute at issue in any of the prior proceedings
People v. McCray
58 Cal.App.4th 159 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 65 times
Holding evidence of past violence perpetrated on victim by defendant was clearly relevant to his intent to place victim in fear for her safety in prosecution for stalking and harassment
Malta-Espinoza v. Gonzales
478 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 34 times
Holding that a guilty plea to a complaint charging conjunctively multiple violations of a statute does not establish the defendant was guilty under a specific sub-section of the statute
People v. Borrelli
77 Cal.App.4th 703 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 42 times
Holding that the stalking statute was not unconstitutionally overbroad as it did not "inhibit a substantial amount of protected speech"
Section 1227 - Deportable aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1227 Cited 8,026 times 41 Legal Analyses
Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status
8 U.S.C. § 1229b Cited 5,203 times 24 Legal Analyses
Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
Section 2261A - Stalking
18 U.S.C. § 2261A Cited 633 times 2 Legal Analyses
Criminalizing interstate travel or use of interstate commerce "with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate."

In re Sanchez-Lopez

10 Cited authorities

Holding that commercial bribery falls under the definition of bribery under the Travel Act, which was passed nine years before RICO was enacted

Holding that no due process violation exists unless "the proceeding was so fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his case"

Holding that a unanimity instruction was not required regarding the specific acts that constituted stalking because the crime required proof of a course of conduct, not particular individual acts

Declining to consider facial vagueness challenge where alien had not identified a constitutionally-protected right compromised by the immigration statute at issue in any of the prior proceedings

Holding evidence of past violence perpetrated on victim by defendant was clearly relevant to his intent to place victim in fear for her safety in prosecution for stalking and harassment

Holding that a guilty plea to a complaint charging conjunctively multiple violations of a statute does not establish the defendant was guilty under a specific sub-section of the statute

Holding that the stalking statute was not unconstitutionally overbroad as it did not "inhibit a substantial amount of protected speech"

Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

Criminalizing interstate travel or use of interstate commerce "with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate."