In re Pena

21 Cited authorities

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

    519 U.S. 337 (1997)   Cited 2,525 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term “employees” carries a different meaning in different sections of Title VII
  2. Landon v. Plasencia

    459 U.S. 21 (1982)   Cited 623 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings
  3. United States v. Texas

    507 U.S. 529 (1993)   Cited 292 times
    Holding that silence in a statute "falls far short of an expression of legislative intent to supplant the existing common law in that area"
  4. Rosenberg v. Fleuti

    374 U.S. 449 (1963)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lawful permanent residents who travel abroad should be admitted, even if otherwise inadmissible, if their travel was "brief, casual, or innocent"
  5. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

    344 U.S. 590 (1953)   Cited 282 times
    Holding that an alien who permanently resided in the United States was "a person within the protection of the Fifth Amendment" and therefore was entitled to due process
  6. Savoury v. U.S. Attorney General

    449 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2006)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that an alien was not lawfully admitted when the INS had granted him LPR status without knowing that he had been convicted of possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute
  7. Kyong Ho Shin v. Holder

    607 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that children who were granted LPR status by virtue of their mother's fraudulently-obtained status "were not substantively qualified for admission as LPRs at the time they entered the United States," even though they were not responsible for the fraud
  8. Injeti v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.

    737 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2013)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "a failure to satisfy any one of the statutory prerequisites renders an applicant ineligible for naturalization," the conclusion that petitioner's acts barred a finding of good moral character "was not essential to the district court's grant of summary judgment"
  9. Monet v. I.N.S.

    791 F.2d 752 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that an alien who procured permanent resident status by concealing his ineligibility had not been "lawfully admitted for permanent residence"
  10. De La Rosa v. United States Department of Homeland Security

    489 F.3d 551 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 42 times
    Holding "that an alien is only `lawfully admitted for permanent residence' for purposes of the INA if his or her adjustment to lawful permanent resident complied with substantive legal requirements" and that "[b]ecause [the alien] failed to show that she had complied with the relevant substantive legal requirements the IJ correctly determined that she had not been `lawfully admitted for permanent residence' and was not entitled to § 212(c) relief
  11. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,700 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,902 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  13. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,028 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  14. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,203 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”
  15. Section 1.2 - Definitions

    8 C.F.R. § 1.2   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[a]rriving alien" as "an applicant for admission coming or attempting to come into the United States"