Pereira v. Sessions

Holding that an NTA that omitted the "time or place of the removal proceedings" failed to comply with the requirements of § 239 and was insufficient to trigger the so-called "stop-time rule" of INA § 240A(d)

Yates v. United States

Holding that, in light of a statute's illustrative list, "tangible object" covers "only objects one can use to record or preserve information, not all objects in the physical world"

Niz-Chavez v. Garland

Holding that an NTA must consist of "a single document" containing all requisite information

Santos-Santos v. Barr

Holding that Pereira did not divest courts of jurisdiction to consider removal proceedings after an NTA failed to include the relevant date and time because Pereira concerned the stop-time rule and addressed two statutory provisions that do not pertain to jurisdiction

Maniar v. Garland

Rodriguez v. Garland

Allowing relief following a defective NTA under Niz-Chavez but not Pereira

Chery v. Garland

Concluding that a New York statute was divisible because the statute's plain text suggested "that either a 'hallucinogenic substance other than marijuana' or a 'narcotic substance' [must be] involved" in a violation, and distinguishing the indivisible statute in Harbin, which, by contrast, criminalized selling "controlled substance" generally

Banuelos-Galviz v. Barr

Holding that, before § 1229 repealed § 1252b, an OSC did not require the date and time of the hearing

Tino v. Garland

Failing to establish eligibility for asylum necessarily means failing to meet the requirements for withholding of removal

Yanez-Pena v. Barr

Holding that " the information statutorily required to be contained in an NTA may be supplied in more than one document, and an NTA is perfected, and the stop-time rule is triggered, when the alien receives all required information, whether in one document or more"

Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

Granting this discretion to the Attorney General

Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

Authorizing service by mail

Section 1003.2 - Reopening or reconsideration before the Board of Immigration Appeals

Granting power to Board

Section 1003.23 - Reopening or reconsideration before the immigration court

Providing that an IJ may reopen a case in which he or she has rendered a decision unless jurisdiction is vested with the Board

Section 1003.18 - Docket management

Requiring the NTA to include time, date, and place information only "where practicable"

Section 1003.26 - In absentia hearings

Requiring DHS to establish that written notice of the time and place of proceedings, as well as the consequences of failure to appear, was provided to the alien