§
In re Hernandez

6 Cited authorities

  1. Kisor v. Wilkie

    139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019)   Cited 976 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to determine whether a regulation "is genuinely ambiguous, a court must exhaust all the traditional tools of construction" (cleaned up)

  2. Eberhart v. U.S.

    546 U.S. 12 (2005)   Cited 833 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government forfeited application of a claim-processing rule because its opposition did not invoke that rule

  3. Sameena Inc. v. United States Air Force

    147 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that the Air Force was required to conduct an evidentiary hearing under the FAR after notifying one of several appellants that his debarment had been proposed for extension

  4. Section 1229b - Cancellation of removal; adjustment of status

    8 U.S.C. § 1229b   Cited 5,203 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Attorney General discretion to cancel the removal of an alien who has “been battered or subjected to extreme cruelty by a ... parent who is ... a United States citizen”

  5. Section 1229 - Initiation of removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229   Cited 1,373 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing service by mail

  6. Section 1003.30 - Additional charges in deportation or removal hearings

    8 C.F.R. § 1003.30   Cited 39 times
    Providing that DHS may file additional or substitute charges of removability "[a]t any time during deportation or removal proceedings" and that an "alien may be given a reasonable continuance to respond to the additional factual allegations and charges"