§
In re E-F-H-L

14 Cited authorities

  1. Arulampalam v. Ashcroft

    353 F.3d 679 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 136 times
    Holding that petitioner's omission during an airport interview of specific details of torture that were revealed later at the removal hearing did not support a negative credibility finding

  2. Oshodi v. Holder

    729 F.3d 883 (9th Cir. 2013)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that IJ violated due process by preventing applicant from testifying about "the persecution he described in his application" and overlooking the contents of the affidavit the applicant submitted on the same critical topic

  3. Islam v. Gonzales

    469 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 62 times
    Reviewing claim that IJ was biased against certain immigrants

  4. Mekhoukh v. Ashcroft

    358 F.3d 118 (1st Cir. 2004)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that omission of evidence that "contains no information that materially affects the outcome of [the petitioner's] claims" constitutes harmless error

  5. Sankoh v. Mukasey

    539 F.3d 456 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 21 times
    Finding no evidence that the persecutors imputed a family political opinion that the applicant "did not outwardly hold"

  6. Hoxha v. Gonzales

    446 F.3d 210 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 22 times
    Determining whether "[t]he record ... supports the IJ's determination that [the petitioner] did not convincingly explain the inconsistencies in his case"

  7. Litvinov v. Holder

    605 F.3d 548 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that asylum applicants' general reference to a new law criminalizing opposition to the government in their country of origin did not meet the required objective fear of persecution when applicants could not provide evidence of the referenced law's existence or identify anyone who had been punished under it

  8. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,700 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  9. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,662 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  10. Section 1231 - Detention and removal of aliens ordered removed

    8 U.S.C. § 1231   Cited 7,954 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that once petitioner's removal order was reinstated, he was no longer eligible for "relief" in the form of adjustment of status-even if he could obtain a Form I-212 waiver

  11. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,392 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”

  12. Section 1240.11 - Ancillary matters, applications

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.11   Cited 182 times
    Requiring the immigration judge to inform an alien of his "apparent eligibility" for relief from removal

  13. Section 208.6 - Disclosure to third parties

    8 C.F.R. § 208.6   Cited 143 times
    Requiring appearance before immigration officer for asylum application

  14. Section 236.3 - Processing, detention, and release of alien minors

    8 C.F.R. § 236.3   Cited 47 times

    (a)Generally. (1) DHS treats all minors and unaccompanied alien children (UACs) in its custody with dignity, respect and special concern for their particular vulnerability. (2) The provisions of this section apply to all minors in the legal custody of DHS, including minors who are subject to the mandatory detention provisions of the INA and applicable regulations, to the extent authorized by law. (b)Definitions. For the purposes of this section: (1)Minor means any alien who has not attained eighteen