In re Dominguez-Rodriguez

16 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,165 times   613 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"
  2. Shepard v. U.S.

    544 U.S. 13 (2005)   Cited 4,256 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts may consult "the charging document . . . or . . . some comparable judicial record of this information"
  3. Moncrieffe v. Holder

    569 U.S. 184 (2013)   Cited 1,374 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sharing marijuana not an aggravated felony
  4. Nijhawan v. Holder

    557 U.S. 29 (2009)   Cited 589 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute requires "a circumstance-specific approach" where it refers to "conduct involved 'in' the commission of the offense of conviction, rather than to the elements of the offense"
  5. Rojas v. Attorney Gen. of the U.S.

    728 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2013)   Cited 32 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to be removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(B), the statute of conviction must be under a law relating to a controlled substance, and involve a drug defined in the Controlled Substances Act
  6. Bianco v. Holder

    624 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2010)   Cited 17 times
    In Bianco, however, the panel relied substantially on the Supreme Court's circumstance-specific approach in Hayes, which happened also to apply a circumstance-specific approach in evaluating the generic federal crime of domestic violence.
  7. Mellouli v. Holder

    719 F.3d 995 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 11 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Applying the circumstance-specific approach to the personal-use exception
  8. Varughese v. Holder

    629 F.3d 272 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 8 times
    Relying on petitioner's admission during a plea colloquy and a sentencing hearing
  9. Popescu–Mateffy v. Holder

    678 F.3d 612 (8th Cir. 2012)   Cited 4 times

    No. 11–2192. 2012-05-2 Andrei POPESCU–MATEFFY, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondent. Christine Nsajja, Edina, MN, for petitioner. Nicole Thomas–Dorris, Washington, DC, for respondent. PER CURIAM. Christine Nsajja, Edina, MN, for petitioner. Nicole Thomas–Dorris, Washington, DC, for respondent. Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Andrei Popescu–Mateffy petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

  10. Section 841 - Prohibited acts A

    21 U.S.C. § 841   Cited 93,608 times   148 Legal Analyses
    In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.
  11. Section 924 - Penalties

    18 U.S.C. § 924   Cited 68,034 times   189 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conviction for eluding police, under Maine statute which provides that "[w]hoever, after being requested or signaled to stop, attempts to elude a law enforcement officer by driving a vehicle at a reckless rate of speed which results in a high-speed chase between the operator's vehicle and any law enforcement vehicle using a blue light and siren is guilty" of a felony-level crime, involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)
  12. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,642 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  13. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,876 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  14. Section 1227 - Deportable aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1227   Cited 8,010 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Granting this discretion to the Attorney General
  15. Section 1240.8 - Burdens of proof in removal proceedings

    8 C.F.R. § 1240.8   Cited 311 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Applying "clearly and beyond doubt" burden to "proceedings commenced upon a respondent's arrival" or "[a]liens present in the United States without being admitted"
  16. Section 1212.7 - Waiver of certain grounds of inadmissibility

    8 C.F.R. § 1212.7   Cited 52 times
    Applying the same standard to waivers under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h)