Femelabs LLC

7 Cited authorities

In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.
476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 190 times 32 Legal Analyses
Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"
In re Shell Oil Co.
992 F.2d 1204 (Fed. Cir. 1993) Cited 35 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding a correlation based on evidence of “overlap of consumers”
Shen Manufacturing Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.
393 F.3d 1238 (Fed. Cir. 2004) Cited 20 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that textually identical "RITZ" marks used in cooking classes and kitchen textiles were dissimilar
In re Majestic Distilling Co., Inc.
315 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2003) Cited 12 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that malt liquor and tequila sold under the same mark would cause a likelihood of confusion
Application of Bissett-Berman Corporation
476 F.2d 640 (C.C.P.A. 1973) Cited 3 times
Stating that self-serving testimony of appellant's corporate president's unawareness of instances of actual confusion was not conclusive that actual confusion did not exist or that there was no likelihood of confusion
Feed Service Corp. v. FS Services, Inc.
432 F.2d 478 (C.C.P.A. 1970) Cited 3 times
Patent Appeal No. 8349. October 29, 1970. Thomas Cifelli, Jr., William E. Hedges, Richards Cifelli, Newark, N.J., attorneys of record, for appellant. Richard Bushnell, Olson, Trexler, Wolters Bushnell, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and McMANUS, Judge, Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. LANE, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 156 USPQ 255 (1967), which sustained two oppositions brought by appellee
Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration
15 U.S.C. § 1052 Cited 1,598 times 274 Legal Analyses
Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

Femelabs LLC

7 Cited authorities

In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

In re Shell Oil Co.

Finding a correlation based on evidence of “overlap of consumers”

Shen Manufacturing Co. v. Ritz Hotel Ltd.

Holding that textually identical "RITZ" marks used in cooking classes and kitchen textiles were dissimilar

In re Majestic Distilling Co., Inc.

Holding that malt liquor and tequila sold under the same mark would cause a likelihood of confusion

Application of Bissett-Berman Corporation

Stating that self-serving testimony of appellant's corporate president's unawareness of instances of actual confusion was not conclusive that actual confusion did not exist or that there was no likelihood of confusion

Feed Service Corp. v. FS Services, Inc.

Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"