§

Caesars Entertainment Corporation d/lb/a Rio All-Suites Hotel and Casino

362 NLRB No. 190 (N.L.R.B. 2015)
Caesars Entertainment Corporation d/lb/a Rio All-Suites Hotel and Casino

13 Cited authorities

  1. Hollingsworth v. Perry

    558 U.S. 183 (2010)   Cited 411 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a district court's local rules have "the force of law"

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014)   Cited 30 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

  5. Community Hospitals of Cent Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.3d 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the single-facility presumption can be rebutted by a showing of “functional integration,” among other factors

  6. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 17 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  7. Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations

    253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

  8. Guard Publishing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    571 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Reviewing an employer's challenge to only the unfavorable portions of an NLRB ruling

  9. Double Eagle Hotel Casino v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.3d 1249 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 10 times
    Sustaining Board invalidation of policy defining "confidential information" to include salary information

  10. Flagstaff Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    715 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir. 2013)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1326 11–1398. 2013-04-26 FLAGSTAFF MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Steven D. Wheeless argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Alan M. Bayless Feldman. Elizabeth A. Heaney, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel